Montreal Canadiens vs Buffalo Sabres Game 1 Prediction: Best Bet Is the Over
Updated July 9, 2026
Game 1 is finally here in this highly anticipated series between two young, offensive-minded teams. Both squads advanced past more veteran-led opponents, and with this being the opening game of the series, I expect plenty of goals before things tighten up defensively later on.
This is a series opener with less pressure for both teams. But let's look at what those final games for each team revealed. Montreal closed out Tampa Bay in a stunning Game 7, winning 2-1 on the road with just 9 shots on goal. That scoreline was a Dobes masterpiece more than an offensive performance — the Habs generated almost nothing at 5-on-5, finishing the series with the fewest expected goals per 60 of any team in Round 1. Buffalo, meanwhile, dismantled Boston in Game 6 by a convincing 4-1 margin with the red-hot Alex Lyon in net and their offense clicking on all cylinders.
The moneyline is at a near-coin-flip price. Buffalo at -130 implies about 57% probability; the model puts them closer to 54%, so there is not meaningful moneyline value either direction. The real edge discussion centers on the total. The market opened at 5.5 with the over priced at -130, and the structural case for the over is genuine: Buffalo led all Round 1 teams in shots per 60 at 5-on-5 (30.9), Montreal's 5-on-5 offense was the worst in Round 1 by expected goals, and Dobes — elite as he has been — will face a heavy workload. These two teams also have a documented tendency toward high-scoring games. The over is not a screaming value at -130, but it is the most defensible angle available.
Later this evening, the Golden Knights take on the Ducks in Game 2.
Buffalo ends a 15-year playoff drought in style — they did not just survive, they swept away Boston's identity with a physical, high-volume game built around Tage Thompson and Rasmus Dahlin. Montreal, meanwhile, is the battle-scarred underdog. Every single game in their Tampa series was decided by 1 goal. They won Game 7 on the road with 9 shots. That is not a repeatable blueprint, but it says something real about the team's composure and Dobes' ability to perform in absolute crisis.
In Game 6 against Boston, Buffalo dominated from the opening drop. They scored 2 goals in the first period, allowed 1 in the second, then closed it out with 2 more in the third including an empty-netter. Rasmus Dahlin was the engine, firing 5 shots with 2 assists. Josh Doan and Zach Benson were active throughout. Alex Lyon — who took over from a struggling Luukkonen in Game 3 — finished the series at a 1.14 GAA and .955 save percentage over 4 games. The Sabres closed Boston out with authority: disciplined, physically dominant, and offensively varied.
Montreal's Game 7 at Tampa was a survival act that said more about goaltending than offense. Only 9 shots registered, yet the Habs won 2-1. Dobes faced 29 shots and stopped 28. Nick Suzuki scored the go-ahead goal at 5-on-5, Kaiden Guhle added 2 assists, and Lane Hutson ran the point play efficiently. Critically, Montreal won the faceoff battle at 53% — Phillip Danault in particular at 64% — which matters more than any shot metric in a low-event, grind-it-out game. The Habs controlled what they could control, rode Dobes through the rest, and did not buckle when Tampa pressed in the 2nd period.
The most significant development for Buffalo's lineup entering this series is Noah Ostlund, who is confirmed out with injury. Ostlund had 4 points against Montreal in the regular season and his absence removes a skilled two-way center from Buffalo's depth. Logan Stanley missed Game 6 against Boston with illness but is expected back. On Montreal's side, Patrik Laine is out for the remainder of the playoffs. The key goaltending question for Buffalo: does Lindy Ruff stick with the scorching-hot Alex Lyon, or does he eventually revert to Luukkonen? Lyon has earned his spot. The Sabres showed no hesitation making in-series goalie changes — expect Lyon to start Game 1.
Jakub Dobes is the story of Montreal's playoff run. He posted a 2.03 GAA and .923 save percentage across the Tampa series, and in the final 3 must-win games he allowed just 4 goals on 102 shots. He is 22 years old and operating like a veteran. Against Buffalo in the regular season, he was 2-0 with a .943 save percentage — he has seen this offense before and been excellent. Lyon, if he starts, enters off arguably the best stretch by any goalie in this playoff field: 1.14 GAA, .955 SV% over 4 games. The goaltending matchup is genuinely elite on both sides, and it cuts against extreme high-scoring outcomes.
Tage Thompson had 7 points in 4 regular-season games against Montreal. He is Buffalo's engine at every level of the game — faceoffs, net presence, transition. Dahlin fuels the power play from the point and will be active all game. For Montreal, Nick Suzuki was also at 8 points in the regular-season series and carried that into the Tampa series with 6 points including the Game 7 winner. Cole Caufield had 4 goals against Buffalo in the regular season and enters Round 2 after a relatively quiet first round — he is a candidate to break out. Ivan Demidov, slotted on Montreal's second line, is an elite offensive talent who has yet to fully explode in these playoffs.
Metric | MTL | BUF | Betting impact |
|---|---|---|---|
Last game 5-on-5 shots | 9 shots (Game 7) | 20 shots at ES (Game 6) | Buffalo edge |
Round 1 xGF/60 5-on-5 | 1.99 — lowest in R1 | High-volume, 30.9 shots/60 | Buffalo edge |
Power play | ~20% conversion in R1 | 1 goal on 24 opps vs Boston (4.2%) | Montreal edge |
Goaltending | Dobes — elite (.923 SV%) | Lyon — scorching (.955, 4 GP) | Effectively even |
Faceoffs | Danault dominant at 64% (G7) | Thompson excellent, Ostlund out | Slight Montreal edge |
Injury impact | Laine out (not deployed) | Ostlund out (real top-6 loss) | Slight Montreal edge |
The game script most likely involves Buffalo owning a significant shot advantage at 5-on-5 while Montreal's structure and Dobes keep them in it. Montreal's power play — the sharpest of any team remaining — becomes the great equalizer if Buffalo takes penalties. The Sabres' man-advantage was brutal against Boston (4.2%) and has not been a weapon. If Montreal draws power plays, their specialty team advantage could neutralize Buffalo's even-strength dominance.
Market | Odds | Implied probability |
|---|---|---|
Moneyline — Buffalo | -130 | ~57% |
Moneyline — Montreal | +108 | ~48% |
Total | 5.5 (over -130, under +106) | Over implied ~57% |
Puckline — Montreal -1.5 | -220 | ~69% |
Series line | Both teams -110 | Dead even |
The market is pricing this almost perfectly as a coin flip, and on the moneyline, that is essentially right. The 54/46 win probability split aligns with the series seeding and home-ice factor without screaming value either direction. The over at -130 is more interesting. Yes, both goalies have been elite, which suppresses scoring expectations. But the structural mismatch is real — Buffalo's attack will generate volume, and Dobes will face his busiest game of the playoffs. The over has hit in 6 of the past 8 meetings between these franchises. At -130 it is not a strong value bet, but it is the most defensible side of a tight number.
There is no strong moneyline edge here — the market has priced this game accurately. Buffalo earns a slight lean based on home ice and a superior 5-on-5 structure, but not enough to back at -130. The over at 5.5 is the more defensible angle. Buffalo's offense will test Dobes unlike anything Montreal faced in Round 1, the teams have a documented history of high-scoring games, and the Sabres' power play is the most likely catalyst to normalize. At -130 this is a thin edge, not a slam. Bet the over only if comfortable with a negative-juice situation that requires the total to break favorably — not a must-play, but the strongest available angle entering this series.
Final score prediction: Buffalo 4, Montreal 2
Affiliate DisclosureATS.io uses affiliate links. If you sign up through a link on this page, we may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. Rankings are based on hands-on testing and published criteria, and affiliate relationships do not determine placement.
